{"id":3269,"date":"2012-09-17T15:07:07","date_gmt":"2012-09-17T14:07:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3269"},"modified":"2016-06-09T15:07:57","modified_gmt":"2016-06-09T14:07:57","slug":"award-1196","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2012\/09\/17\/award-1196\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1196"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award 1196 \u2013 2nd degree \u2013 C\/P Gencon \u2013 Damage by sea water to a cargo of fertiliser \u2013 Subrogated underwriters \u2013 Receiver\u2019s obligation to minimize his damage \u2013 Ship owner liability (yes). <\/strong>The failure of watertight hatches having been the cause of wetting by sea water renders the ship owner liable for damages to cargo. Even if the commodity retained its chemical characteristics, its caked aspect made it unfit for spreading leading to a reduction in its market value. The indemnification due from the ship owner is based on the distress sale, of which the principle was agreed by its P and I club, reduced by a certain percentage due to the worsening of damages after improper warehousing by the receiver.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award 1196 \u2013 2nd degree \u2013 C\/P Gencon \u2013 Damage by sea water to a cargo of fertiliser \u2013 Subrogated underwriters \u2013 Receiver\u2019s obligation to minimize his damage \u2013 Ship owner liability (yes). The failure of watertight hatches having been the cause of wetting by sea water renders the ship owner liable for damages to<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3269","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3269"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3269\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3270,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3269\/revisions\/3270"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3269"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}