{"id":3272,"date":"2012-07-02T15:10:44","date_gmt":"2012-07-02T14:10:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3272"},"modified":"2016-06-09T15:17:46","modified_gmt":"2016-06-09T14:17:46","slug":"award-1195","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2012\/07\/02\/award-1195\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1195"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award 1195 \u2013 Voyage charter \u2013 Discharging in Ivory Coast &#8211; European regulation forbidding any financial relationship with Ivory Coast authorities \u2013 Impossibility to perform \u2013 Ship Owner compensation (yes) \u2013 Unrecovered expenses (yes ) \u2013 Los to pportunity of profit (no). <\/strong>The voyage charter to Abidjan was contrary to European regulation, forbidding at the time any payment through the local authorities, rendering its execution impossible which vindicates the charterer\u2019s decision to cancel the charter. However, as the charterer\u2019s decision was not free from any mistake, the charterer must indemnify the ship owner for his unrecoverable expenses but not for his lost opportunity of profit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award 1195 \u2013 Voyage charter \u2013 Discharging in Ivory Coast &#8211; European regulation forbidding any financial relationship with Ivory Coast authorities \u2013 Impossibility to perform \u2013 Ship Owner compensation (yes) \u2013 Unrecovered expenses (yes ) \u2013 Los to pportunity of profit (no). The voyage charter to Abidjan was contrary to European regulation, forbidding at the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3272"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3273,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3272\/revisions\/3273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}