{"id":3303,"date":"2012-01-24T10:22:06","date_gmt":"2012-01-24T09:22:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3303"},"modified":"2016-06-10T10:22:50","modified_gmt":"2016-06-10T09:22:50","slug":"award-1191","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2012\/01\/24\/award-1191\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1191"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award 1191 &#8211; Rice in bags under B\/L to order &#8211; Surrogate insurer &#8211; Loss payee clause &#8211; Admissibility (yes) \u2013 Assessment of loss. <\/strong>Despite some clerical errors in documents produced by the claimant, it appears from\u00a0the facts that the seller received the indemnity on behalf of the buyer to whom he transferred it. Therefore, by virtue of the deed of subrogation delivered by the receiver, the insurer is entitled to claim. The carrier\u2019s liability being undisputed, in the absence of official market prices, the arbitrators assessed the damages on the basis of the CIF price invoiced plus 5 %.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award 1191 &#8211; Rice in bags under B\/L to order &#8211; Surrogate insurer &#8211; Loss payee clause &#8211; Admissibility (yes) \u2013 Assessment of loss. Despite some clerical errors in documents produced by the claimant, it appears from\u00a0the facts that the seller received the indemnity on behalf of the buyer to whom he transferred it. Therefore,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3303","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3303","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3303"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3303\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3304,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3303\/revisions\/3304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}