{"id":3338,"date":"2011-07-04T10:16:40","date_gmt":"2011-07-04T09:16:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3338"},"modified":"2016-06-13T10:30:31","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T09:30:31","slug":"award-1185","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2011\/07\/04\/award-1185\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1185"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Aw a r d 1 1 8 5 &#8211; C h a r t e r &#8211; P a r t y SYNACOMEX \u2013 Wheat in bulk \u2013 Caked cargo found during discharging \u2013 Cargo damaged before loading \u2013 Charterers liability (yes). <\/strong>In this case, where the shipowner was the\u00a0claimant, the arbitrators considered that the conclusions of survey reports constituted sufficient evidence to lead\u00a0them to find that cargo damage discovered during discharge occurred prior to loading operations and that, according to the Charter-Party, the ship owner should not be held responsible. Charterers were found liable to indemnify shipowner\u2019s financial losses and expenses, including loss of time during the ship\u2019s arrest.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Aw a r d 1 1 8 5 &#8211; C h a r t e r &#8211; P a r t y SYNACOMEX \u2013 Wheat in bulk \u2013 Caked cargo found during discharging \u2013 Cargo damaged before loading \u2013 Charterers liability (yes). In this case, where the shipowner was the\u00a0claimant, the arbitrators considered that the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3338"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3339,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3338\/revisions\/3339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}