{"id":3381,"date":"2010-03-31T13:24:16","date_gmt":"2010-03-31T12:24:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3381"},"modified":"2016-06-13T13:24:53","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T12:24:53","slug":"award-1174","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2010\/03\/31\/award-1174\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1174"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b0 1174 &#8211; Gencon C\/P &#8211; Reefer carriage &#8211; Damages to cargo \u2013 Commercial unseaworthiness state \u2013 Shipowner liability. <\/strong>On board reefer power being insufficient, mould ascertained at discharging was caused by over delay in cooling. The shipowner failed in its obligation to deliver a commercial seaworthy vessel. Shipowner is liable for damages and must bear financial loss on destroyed cargo and various expenses linked with damages.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b0 1174 &#8211; Gencon C\/P &#8211; Reefer carriage &#8211; Damages to cargo \u2013 Commercial unseaworthiness state \u2013 Shipowner liability. On board reefer power being insufficient, mould ascertained at discharging was caused by over delay in cooling. The shipowner failed in its obligation to deliver a commercial seaworthy vessel. Shipowner is liable for damages and<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3381"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3382,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3381\/revisions\/3382"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}