{"id":3390,"date":"2010-01-29T13:33:51","date_gmt":"2010-01-29T12:33:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3390"},"modified":"2016-06-13T13:34:48","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T12:34:48","slug":"award-1171","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2010\/01\/29\/award-1171\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1171"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01171 \u2013 Shipbuilding contract for a tuna fishing vessel \u2013 Claim for contribution from third party. <\/strong>Amongst disorders ascertained by a court appointed surveyor following the delivery, the contractual guarantee for alleged out of alignment was not accepted because the proceedings to initiate it was not properly\u00a0followed ; on the other hand, the shipyard was held liable in the frame of the guarantee for the spoiling of the fish tanks coatings jointly observed by the parties involved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01171 \u2013 Shipbuilding contract for a tuna fishing vessel \u2013 Claim for contribution from third party. Amongst disorders ascertained by a court appointed surveyor following the delivery, the contractual guarantee for alleged out of alignment was not accepted because the proceedings to initiate it was not properly\u00a0followed ; on the other hand, the shipyard<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3390"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3390\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3391,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3390\/revisions\/3391"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}