{"id":3408,"date":"2009-09-30T14:14:42","date_gmt":"2009-09-30T13:14:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3408"},"modified":"2016-06-13T14:15:34","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T13:15:34","slug":"award-1165","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2009\/09\/30\/award-1165\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1165"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01165 \u2013 30\/09\/2009 &#8211; Supplytime C-P \u2013 Fasttrack procedure \u2013 Motto : \u00ab Criminal proceedings take precedence over civil proceedings \u00bb &#8211; Stay of proceedings (No). <\/strong>Following an engine breakdown and an off-hire period, a draft agreement acknowledging a monetary claim in favour of charterers was not honoured by owners who lodged a criminal complaint against charterers. The stay of proceedings requested by owners is not granted because the motto \u00ab Criminal proceedings take precedence over civil proceedings \u00bb is not applicable in case of international arbitration proceedings. Owners held liable to pay the undisputed monetary claim as evidenced in the draft agreement as well as other expenses borne by charterers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01165 \u2013 30\/09\/2009 &#8211; Supplytime C-P \u2013 Fasttrack procedure \u2013 Motto : \u00ab Criminal proceedings take precedence over civil proceedings \u00bb &#8211; Stay of proceedings (No). Following an engine breakdown and an off-hire period, a draft agreement acknowledging a monetary claim in favour of charterers was not honoured by owners who lodged a criminal<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3408","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3408","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3408"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3408\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3409,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3408\/revisions\/3409"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3408"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3408"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3408"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}