{"id":3417,"date":"2009-08-25T14:27:58","date_gmt":"2009-08-25T13:27:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3417"},"modified":"2016-06-13T14:28:38","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T13:28:38","slug":"award-1162","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2009\/08\/25\/award-1162\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1162"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01162 \u2013 (Second degree) \u2013 Time C\/P &#8211; Carriage of bagged rice under b\/l &#8211; Cargo damage &#8211; Letter of guarantee &#8211; Ostensible authority \u2013 Jurisdiction. <\/strong>Although the Letter of guarantee from the owner&rsquo;s P&amp;I Club was issued \u00ab\u00a0on behalf of owner and\/or carriers\u00a0\u00bb and stipulates that the jurisdiction of the CAMP \u00a0\u00bb is expressly accepted by all parties whose interest lie with the vessel \u201d, it appears that the defendant, being the timecharterer and carrier was not involved in the negotiation of the terms of the Letter of guarantee. As a result there was no ostensible authority to believe that the defendant could be bound by the terms of the Letter of guarantee of the Owner&rsquo;s P&amp;I Club. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction over the claim brought by cargo interests against the time-charterer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01162 \u2013 (Second degree) \u2013 Time C\/P &#8211; Carriage of bagged rice under b\/l &#8211; Cargo damage &#8211; Letter of guarantee &#8211; Ostensible authority \u2013 Jurisdiction. Although the Letter of guarantee from the owner&rsquo;s P&amp;I Club was issued \u00ab\u00a0on behalf of owner and\/or carriers\u00a0\u00bb and stipulates that the jurisdiction of the CAMP \u00a0\u00bb is<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3417"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3417\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3418,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3417\/revisions\/3418"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}