{"id":3426,"date":"2008-11-03T14:37:23","date_gmt":"2008-11-03T13:37:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3426"},"modified":"2016-06-13T14:38:05","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T13:38:05","slug":"award-1159","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2008\/11\/03\/award-1159\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1159"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01159 \u2013 Sale contract for yachts &#8211; Partial non-performance \u2013 Cancellation clause. <\/strong>A contract of sale provides for the newbuilding of two yachts and that two similar second hand yachts would be made available during the shipbuilding period, along with a payment schedule. Several buyer&rsquo;s obligations having not\u00a0been met \u2013 especially non-payment of due instalments \u2013 arbitrators, based on the cancellation clause, decided the\u00a0rescission of the contract in favor of the seller. The parties must be restored in the respective position as they were prior to the conclusion of the contract.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01159 \u2013 Sale contract for yachts &#8211; Partial non-performance \u2013 Cancellation clause. A contract of sale provides for the newbuilding of two yachts and that two similar second hand yachts would be made available during the shipbuilding period, along with a payment schedule. Several buyer&rsquo;s obligations having not\u00a0been met \u2013 especially non-payment of due<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3426"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3427,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3426\/revisions\/3427"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}