{"id":3429,"date":"2008-11-08T14:40:37","date_gmt":"2008-11-08T13:40:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3429"},"modified":"2016-06-13T14:41:17","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T13:41:17","slug":"award-1158","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2008\/11\/08\/award-1158\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1158"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01158 \u2013 Synacomex charter-party \u2013 Bulk maize \u2013 Cargo shortage \u2013 Action for indemnity against the charterer to guarantee any court decision against the owner \u2013 Owner performing its obligations \u2013\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Guarantee required from charterers was well-founded. <\/strong>Cargo weight measured by draft survey, in accordance with c-p terms, is roughly similar at discharging port than at load port. The owner, having performed its obligations, should be guaranteed by the seller\/charterer from having been condemned as sea carrier to indemnify the cargo receiver.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01158 \u2013 Synacomex charter-party \u2013 Bulk maize \u2013 Cargo shortage \u2013 Action for indemnity against the charterer to guarantee any court decision against the owner \u2013 Owner performing its obligations \u2013\u00a0Guarantee required from charterers was well-founded. Cargo weight measured by draft survey, in accordance with c-p terms, is roughly similar at discharging port than<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3429"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3429\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3430,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3429\/revisions\/3430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}