{"id":3433,"date":"2008-11-08T14:45:45","date_gmt":"2008-11-08T13:45:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3433"},"modified":"2016-06-13T14:46:19","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T13:46:19","slug":"award-1157","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2008\/11\/08\/award-1157\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1157"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award n\u00b01157 \u2013 Synacomex charter-party and bill of lading \u2013 Bulk maize \u2013 Cargo shortage \u2013 Liability of the owner as sea carrier. <\/strong>FIO and draft survey clauses of the c-p cannot be put forward against the cargo receiver which had no prior knowledge of them. The owner, as sea carrier, is liable for cargo shortage as evidenced after weighing through the port scale.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award n\u00b01157 \u2013 Synacomex charter-party and bill of lading \u2013 Bulk maize \u2013 Cargo shortage \u2013 Liability of the owner as sea carrier. FIO and draft survey clauses of the c-p cannot be put forward against the cargo receiver which had no prior knowledge of them. The owner, as sea carrier, is liable for cargo<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3433","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3433","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3433"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3434,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3433\/revisions\/3434"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}