{"id":3444,"date":"2008-05-22T14:56:25","date_gmt":"2008-05-22T13:56:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3444"},"modified":"2016-06-13T14:57:08","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T13:57:08","slug":"award-1155","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2008\/05\/22\/award-1155\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1155"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b0 1155 \u2013 Second degree &#8211; \u00ab Sugar \u00bb c-p \u2013 Refusal of the Master to discharge in spite a letter of indemnity (LOI) was tendered by the charterer \u2013 Loss of time \u2013 Demurrage due by the charterer. <\/strong>The c-p clause providing for discharging the cargo against a LOI in the absence of the original b-l does not create an absolute right for the charterer to have the cargo discharged, insofar as the cargo situation was not regularised because the charterer (FOB buyer) has not paid its seller. The clause cannot legitimate a fraud in the rights of a third party. The charterer is ordered to pay demurrage caused by the loss of time waiting for the cargo to be paid.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b0 1155 \u2013 Second degree &#8211; \u00ab Sugar \u00bb c-p \u2013 Refusal of the Master to discharge in spite a letter of indemnity (LOI) was tendered by the charterer \u2013 Loss of time \u2013 Demurrage due by the charterer. The c-p clause providing for discharging the cargo against a LOI in the absence of<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3444"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3444\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3445,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3444\/revisions\/3445"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}