{"id":3451,"date":"2008-04-01T09:51:27","date_gmt":"2008-04-01T08:51:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3451"},"modified":"2016-06-16T09:52:19","modified_gmt":"2016-06-16T08:52:19","slug":"award-1153","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2008\/04\/01\/award-1153\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1153"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01153 \u2013 \u00ab Synacomex \u00bb c-p \u2013 Cargo damages \u2013 Charterer obligation to discharge the cargo \u2013 Time lost due to a reduced discharging rate deducted from laytime. <\/strong>Even in the presence of damaged cargo the charterer still have the fundamental obligation to discharge it. Time continue to count during the discharge of the cargo, be it sound or damaged, but the owner must indemnify the charterer for the inevitable slow down of the discharge operations resulting from the damaged part.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01153 \u2013 \u00ab Synacomex \u00bb c-p \u2013 Cargo damages \u2013 Charterer obligation to discharge the cargo \u2013 Time lost due to a reduced discharging rate deducted from laytime. Even in the presence of damaged cargo the charterer still have the fundamental obligation to discharge it. Time continue to count during the discharge of the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3451"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3451\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3452,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3451\/revisions\/3452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}