{"id":3454,"date":"2008-03-31T09:54:19","date_gmt":"2008-03-31T08:54:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3454"},"modified":"2016-06-16T09:54:57","modified_gmt":"2016-06-16T08:54:57","slug":"award-1152","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2008\/03\/31\/award-1152\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1152"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01152 \u2013 Second degree \u2013 \u00ab Baltimore form C \u00bb c-p \u2013 Contamination of a soya bean meal cargo \u2013 English law to apply \u2013 Charterer and receiver part of the same group of companies \u2013 Which legal system has relevance ? <\/strong>Although the parties have agreed to give jurisdiction to the CAMP, they have not changed the law mentioned on the b-l on which theapplication was introduced before the CAMP ; as a result English law was applicable. When the b-l has not circulated outside the group of companies to which belong the charterer and receiver, the latter cannot ignore the details of the charter-party incorporated into the b-l. The liability regime applicable to the owner\/carrier is the Brussels Convention subject to c-p terms and it is only bound by a best endeavours obligation. The owner\/carrier cannot be held liable for cargo damages which, most probably, were pre-exisiting to the loading operations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01152 \u2013 Second degree \u2013 \u00ab Baltimore form C \u00bb c-p \u2013 Contamination of a soya bean meal cargo \u2013 English law to apply \u2013 Charterer and receiver part of the same group of companies \u2013 Which legal system has relevance ? Although the parties have agreed to give jurisdiction to the CAMP, they<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3454"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3454\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3455,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3454\/revisions\/3455"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}