{"id":3463,"date":"2007-11-07T10:03:24","date_gmt":"2007-11-07T09:03:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3463"},"modified":"2016-06-16T10:04:03","modified_gmt":"2016-06-16T09:04:03","slug":"award-1149","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2007\/11\/07\/award-1149\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1149"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01149 \u2013 Transport of bagged rice under b\/l \u2013 Letter of indemnity \u2013 Damages and shortage \u2013 Owner liable as being the carrier. <\/strong>Damages and shortage were ascertained on a cargo of bagged rice. The owner, maritime carrier identified on the b\/l, was held responsible in accordance with the terms of the 1924 Brussels Convention and condemned to reimburse the amount of the prejudice borne by the subrogated underwriters in the rights of the consignee.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01149 \u2013 Transport of bagged rice under b\/l \u2013 Letter of indemnity \u2013 Damages and shortage \u2013 Owner liable as being the carrier. Damages and shortage were ascertained on a cargo of bagged rice. The owner, maritime carrier identified on the b\/l, was held responsible in accordance with the terms of the 1924 Brussels<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3463"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3463\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3464,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3463\/revisions\/3464"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}