{"id":3507,"date":"2007-02-26T14:27:31","date_gmt":"2007-02-26T13:27:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3507"},"modified":"2016-06-16T14:28:19","modified_gmt":"2016-06-16T13:28:19","slug":"award-1135","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2007\/02\/26\/award-1135\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1135"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01135 &#8211; (2nd degree) \u2013 Vessel grounded during a river transit &#8211; Intervention of a tug \u2013 Mere towing service but no assistance. <\/strong>Following a main engine breakdown in river Seine, a RoRo vessel went aground, she then managed to tie up alongside a close by jetty. The presence of a tug was required while waiting for the flood tide, then the vessel was successfully refloated using her bow thruster and with the tug in attendance. In the meantime, the main engine\u00a0having been fixed, the vessel made her way towards her destination. The Tribunal ruled that, at no stage, neither the vessel nor her cargo were in a dangerous situation and therefore employment performed by the attending tug cannot be defined as \u00ab assistance \u00bb but were mere towing service and tide watch.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01135 &#8211; (2nd degree) \u2013 Vessel grounded during a river transit &#8211; Intervention of a tug \u2013 Mere towing service but no assistance. Following a main engine breakdown in river Seine, a RoRo vessel went aground, she then managed to tie up alongside a close by jetty. The presence of a tug was required<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3507","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3507"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3507\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3508,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3507\/revisions\/3508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3507"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3507"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3507"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}