{"id":3521,"date":"2006-10-03T14:52:07","date_gmt":"2006-10-03T13:52:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3521"},"modified":"2016-06-16T14:52:45","modified_gmt":"2016-06-16T13:52:45","slug":"award-1132","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2006\/10\/03\/award-1132\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1132"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01132 &#8211; (Second degree) : Synacomex c\/p \u2013 Arbitration clause of the c\/p incorporated into the b\/l \u2013 Validity of unsigned c\/p. <\/strong>In an international arbitration under French law, it is enough that the bill of lading clearly shows that charter-party clauses \u00abincluding the law and arbitration clause\u00bb are incorporated herewith, for the party to the bill of lading against which the clause is put forward to be held to have impliedly accepted it. The unsigned charter-party is valid provided it exists evidences that it has been drawn up in accordance with the \u00abfixture recap\u00bb and that bills of lading refers to this charter-party. Arbitrators declined competence to deal with a general average claim which provides for London arbitration.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01132 &#8211; (Second degree) : Synacomex c\/p \u2013 Arbitration clause of the c\/p incorporated into the b\/l \u2013 Validity of unsigned c\/p. In an international arbitration under French law, it is enough that the bill of lading clearly shows that charter-party clauses \u00abincluding the law and arbitration clause\u00bb are incorporated herewith, for the party<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3521"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3521\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3522,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3521\/revisions\/3522"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}