{"id":3524,"date":"2006-07-31T15:28:21","date_gmt":"2006-07-31T14:28:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3524"},"modified":"2016-06-16T15:29:10","modified_gmt":"2016-06-16T14:29:10","slug":"award-1131","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2006\/07\/31\/award-1131\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01131 &#8211; Damages to the cargo \u2013 Contradictory tally reports \u2013 Carrier\u2019s responsability. <\/strong>When, following cargo pilferage as well as numerous damages at the discharging port, a Captain signed the out-turn reports without any accurate and justified reservations but with simple comments, merely on principle, arbitrators decided that out-turn reports are deemed to have been signed contradictorily and owner\u2019s responsibility is bound in accordance with the Brussels Convention applicable as a result of the Paramount clause incorporated into the bill of lading.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01131 &#8211; Damages to the cargo \u2013 Contradictory tally reports \u2013 Carrier\u2019s responsability. When, following cargo pilferage as well as numerous damages at the discharging port, a Captain signed the out-turn reports without any accurate and justified reservations but with simple comments, merely on principle, arbitrators decided that out-turn reports are deemed to have<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3524","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3524","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3524"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3524\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3525,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3524\/revisions\/3525"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3524"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3524"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3524"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}