{"id":3527,"date":"2006-05-23T15:31:11","date_gmt":"2006-05-23T14:31:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3527"},"modified":"2016-06-16T15:31:52","modified_gmt":"2016-06-16T14:31:52","slug":"award-1130","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2006\/05\/23\/award-1130\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1130"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01130 &#8211; Synacomex c\/p \u2013 Grounding \u2013 Safe port\/berth \u2013 Obligation to continue the voyage.\u00a0<\/strong>It is not enough for a port to be unsafe that a vessel, because of a strong current, broke her mooring ropes and run aground on nearby rocks. The main cause of this accident stands with an inappropriate handling of the ship while adjusting mooring lines. Besides, the owner was obliged to continue the voyage upon completion of repairs and charter-party cancellation was made at owner\u2019s harm and prejudice.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01130 &#8211; Synacomex c\/p \u2013 Grounding \u2013 Safe port\/berth \u2013 Obligation to continue the voyage.\u00a0It is not enough for a port to be unsafe that a vessel, because of a strong current, broke her mooring ropes and run aground on nearby rocks. The main cause of this accident stands with an inappropriate handling of<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3527","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3527"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3527\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3528,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3527\/revisions\/3528"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3527"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}