{"id":3530,"date":"2006-05-10T15:42:21","date_gmt":"2006-05-10T14:42:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3530"},"modified":"2016-06-16T15:43:07","modified_gmt":"2016-06-16T14:43:07","slug":"award-1129","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2006\/05\/10\/award-1129\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1129"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01129 &#8211; Damages to steel products \u2013 Perils of the sea \u2013 Carrier\u2019s responsability. <\/strong>Mate\u2019s receipts in respect of a cargo of steel products were claused \u00abwet and dirty\u00bb. Chloride tests having been negative,\u00a0owners were not responsible for resulting rust damages to the cargo. When there are evidences that cargo stowage has been carried out properly by professionals, damages flowing from cargo shifting in very bad weather amount to perils of the sea. The carrier\u2019s fault may however combine with the perils of the sea exception because the vessel maintained her heading towards the second discharging port without taking appropriate steps to protect the cargo.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01129 &#8211; Damages to steel products \u2013 Perils of the sea \u2013 Carrier\u2019s responsability. Mate\u2019s receipts in respect of a cargo of steel products were claused \u00abwet and dirty\u00bb. Chloride tests having been negative,\u00a0owners were not responsible for resulting rust damages to the cargo. When there are evidences that cargo stowage has been carried<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3530","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3530"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3530\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3531,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3530\/revisions\/3531"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3530"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}