{"id":3542,"date":"2005-12-24T09:53:25","date_gmt":"2005-12-24T08:53:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3542"},"modified":"2016-06-17T09:54:02","modified_gmt":"2016-06-17T08:54:02","slug":"award-1123","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2005\/12\/24\/award-1123\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1123"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b01123 &#8211; Charter-party bill of lading marked \u00abFIOS\u00bb. <\/strong>The acronym \u00abFIOS\u00bb mentioned on bills of lading causes them to be opposable to a third party holder as well as to their subrogated underwriters because it constitutes a provision of the contract of carriage in respect of the loading and delivery of the cargo. It cannot be considered as a mere financial clause.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b01123 &#8211; Charter-party bill of lading marked \u00abFIOS\u00bb. The acronym \u00abFIOS\u00bb mentioned on bills of lading causes them to be opposable to a third party holder as well as to their subrogated underwriters because it constitutes a provision of the contract of carriage in respect of the loading and delivery of the cargo. It<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3542"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3542\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3543,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3542\/revisions\/3543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}