{"id":3548,"date":"2005-07-25T10:01:03","date_gmt":"2005-07-25T09:01:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3548"},"modified":"2016-06-17T10:03:09","modified_gmt":"2016-06-17T09:03:09","slug":"award-1121","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2005\/07\/25\/award-1121\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1121"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b0 1121 \u2013 Sugar c\/p \u2013 Letter of undertaking \u2013 Jurisdiction &#8211; Stevedores as owners\u2019 servants. <\/strong>The arbitration Tribunal has competence over its own jurisdiction resulting of the negotiations for the issuance of a letter of undertaking. This jurisdiction cannot be considered as having been exacted under hardship. When a charter-party provides that stevedores are deemed to be owners\u2019 servants, the owner is contractually responsible for the stevedoring operations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b0 1121 \u2013 Sugar c\/p \u2013 Letter of undertaking \u2013 Jurisdiction &#8211; Stevedores as owners\u2019 servants. The arbitration Tribunal has competence over its own jurisdiction resulting of the negotiations for the issuance of a letter of undertaking. This jurisdiction cannot be considered as having been exacted under hardship. When a charter-party provides that stevedores<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3548"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3548\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3549,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3548\/revisions\/3549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}