{"id":3567,"date":"2005-06-13T10:23:59","date_gmt":"2005-06-13T09:23:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3567"},"modified":"2016-06-17T10:24:28","modified_gmt":"2016-06-17T09:24:28","slug":"award-1115","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2005\/06\/13\/award-1115\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1115"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b0 1115 &#8211; Barecon c-p \u2013 Unpaid hire. <\/strong>A defaulting charterer, not paying hire and showing a deceptive behaviour by hiding the geographical position of both vessels after the legitimate cancellation of the c-p, must not only remit unpaid hire in full but also be liable for penalties because of late redelivery, as provided for by the governing law (Algerian law in the case).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b0 1115 &#8211; Barecon c-p \u2013 Unpaid hire. A defaulting charterer, not paying hire and showing a deceptive behaviour by hiding the geographical position of both vessels after the legitimate cancellation of the c-p, must not only remit unpaid hire in full but also be liable for penalties because of late redelivery, as provided<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3567","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3567","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3567"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3567\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3568,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3567\/revisions\/3568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3567"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3567"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3567"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}