{"id":3603,"date":"2004-11-23T09:09:04","date_gmt":"2004-11-23T08:09:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3603"},"modified":"2016-06-20T09:09:50","modified_gmt":"2016-06-20T08:09:50","slug":"award-1103","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2004\/11\/23\/award-1103\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b0 1103 \u2013 (Second degree) Vessel detained by Customs once loaded. <\/strong>The vessel was detained and obliged to offload her cargo at the port of loading following a Court decision rendered upon request of Customs and this situation arose because of a failure of shippers which, in terms of responsibility, binds Charterers. Neither the restraint of Princes, nor the force majeure arguments can be received. Owners are entitled to freight and demurrage. \u00ab Jus ex facto orator \u00bb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b0 1103 \u2013 (Second degree) Vessel detained by Customs once loaded. The vessel was detained and obliged to offload her cargo at the port of loading following a Court decision rendered upon request of Customs and this situation arose because of a failure of shippers which, in terms of responsibility, binds Charterers. Neither the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3603"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3603\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3604,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3603\/revisions\/3604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}