{"id":3606,"date":"2004-08-02T09:11:29","date_gmt":"2004-08-02T08:11:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3606"},"modified":"2016-06-20T09:12:07","modified_gmt":"2016-06-20T08:12:07","slug":"award-1102","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2004\/08\/02\/award-1102\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1102"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b0 1102 \u2013 (Second degree) Obligation to discharge \u2013 Safe port. <\/strong>While discharging a bulk wheat cargo in Algeria, wet damages were ascertained in hold n\u00b01. Even though Owners remain responsible for the consequence of the wet damages, Charterers must not attempt to escape from their obligation to discharge the full cargo \u2013 including the damaged cargo \u2013 by referring to the restraint of Princes or the force majeure clauses. On the other hand, Owners cannot claim that the port is unsafe, only because the vessel had to temporarily leave the berth due to bad whether.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b0 1102 \u2013 (Second degree) Obligation to discharge \u2013 Safe port. While discharging a bulk wheat cargo in Algeria, wet damages were ascertained in hold n\u00b01. Even though Owners remain responsible for the consequence of the wet damages, Charterers must not attempt to escape from their obligation to discharge the full cargo \u2013 including<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3606"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3607,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3606\/revisions\/3607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}