{"id":3609,"date":"2004-06-17T09:13:43","date_gmt":"2004-06-17T08:13:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3609"},"modified":"2016-06-20T09:14:14","modified_gmt":"2016-06-20T08:14:14","slug":"award-1101","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2004\/06\/17\/award-1101\/","title":{"rendered":"Award 1101"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Award N\u00b0 1101 \u2013 Collision \u2013 Time-bar \u2013 Quantum of damages. <\/strong>When parties entered into a signed agreement providing for a 70\/30 split of damages sustained as a result of a collision between a cargo-ship and 2 trawlers engaged in fishing, it is not possible to further claim that the action is time-barred. The arbitration proceedings only deal with the amount of damages to be shared in accordance with the signed agreement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Award N\u00b0 1101 \u2013 Collision \u2013 Time-bar \u2013 Quantum of damages. When parties entered into a signed agreement providing for a 70\/30 split of damages sustained as a result of a collision between a cargo-ship and 2 trawlers engaged in fishing, it is not possible to further claim that the action is time-barred. The arbitration<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3609"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3609\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3610,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3609\/revisions\/3610"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}