{"id":3677,"date":"1995-06-12T10:40:00","date_gmt":"1995-06-12T09:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3677"},"modified":"2016-06-21T10:40:37","modified_gmt":"2016-06-21T09:40:37","slug":"sentence-914","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1995\/06\/12\/sentence-914\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 914"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 914 – NYPE – conteneur -manquant – amende douani\u00e8re – prescription \u2013 contra non valentem agere. <\/strong>C\/P New York Produce Exchange – Conteneurs non d\u00e9barqu\u00e9s – r\u00e9clamation de l’Administration des Douanes – Recours de l’Armateur contre l’Affr\u00e9teur – \u00ab\u00a0contra non valentem agere\u00a0\u00bb – conditions d’application non remplies.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 914 – NYPE – conteneur -manquant – amende douani\u00e8re – prescription \u2013 contra non valentem agere. C\/P New York Produce Exchange – Conteneurs non d\u00e9barqu\u00e9s – r\u00e9clamation de l’Administration des Douanes – Recours de l’Armateur contre l’Affr\u00e9teur – \u00ab\u00a0contra non valentem agere\u00a0\u00bb – conditions d’application non remplies.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3677"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3677\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3678,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3677\/revisions\/3678"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}