{"id":3775,"date":"1994-07-24T13:04:43","date_gmt":"1994-07-24T12:04:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3775"},"modified":"2016-06-29T13:05:09","modified_gmt":"2016-06-29T12:05:09","slug":"sentence-887","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1994\/07\/24\/sentence-887\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 887"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 887 &#8211; Avaries par mouille &#8211; Dur\u00e9e excessive du voyage \u2013 D\u00e9tention Synacomex. <\/strong>C\/P SYNACOMEX &#8211; Cargaison de riz en sacs. Avaries par mouille. Expertises non contradictoires n\u00e9anmoins prises en compte. Prolongation du voyage de fa\u00e7on d\u00e9raisonnable. S\u00e9jour anormalement long de la marchandise \u00e0 bord. Affr\u00e9teur responsable. D\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 887 &#8211; Avaries par mouille &#8211; Dur\u00e9e excessive du voyage \u2013 D\u00e9tention Synacomex. C\/P SYNACOMEX &#8211; Cargaison de riz en sacs. Avaries par mouille. Expertises non contradictoires n\u00e9anmoins prises en compte. Prolongation du voyage de fa\u00e7on d\u00e9raisonnable. S\u00e9jour anormalement long de la marchandise \u00e0 bord. Affr\u00e9teur responsable. D\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3775","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3775","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3775"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3775\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3776,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3775\/revisions\/3776"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3775"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3775"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3775"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}