{"id":3793,"date":"1994-06-14T13:19:48","date_gmt":"1994-06-14T12:19:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3793"},"modified":"2016-06-29T13:20:15","modified_gmt":"2016-06-29T12:20:15","slug":"sentence-881","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1994\/06\/14\/sentence-881\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 881"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 881 &#8211; 2eme degr\u00e9. Action r\u00e9cursoire-Construction navale. <\/strong>Construction navale. Action r\u00e9cursoire du chantier naval contre le motoriste. utilisation inhabituelle d&rsquo;un syst\u00e8me d&#8217;embrayage des moteurs. \u00ab\u00a0Non-conformit\u00e9 cach\u00e9e\u00a0\u00bb. Impr\u00e9cision du contrat de commande du navire, de la sp\u00e9cification technique et du contrat de fourniture des appareils moteurs sur le mode d&rsquo;utilisation voulu par l&rsquo;armateur. Examen du ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne de d\u00e9t\u00e9rioration des patins d&#8217;embrayage et de leur support. Examen des \u00e9crits \u00e9chang\u00e9s par les parties. R\u00e9ouverture de l&rsquo;instruction. Principes juridiques applicables en la cause. Responsabilit\u00e9s respectivement encourues pour le pr\u00e9judice subi par le constructeur naval, pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment condamn\u00e9 envers l&rsquo;armateur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 881 &#8211; 2eme degr\u00e9. Action r\u00e9cursoire-Construction navale. Construction navale. Action r\u00e9cursoire du chantier naval contre le motoriste. utilisation inhabituelle d&rsquo;un syst\u00e8me d&#8217;embrayage des moteurs. \u00ab\u00a0Non-conformit\u00e9 cach\u00e9e\u00a0\u00bb. Impr\u00e9cision du contrat de commande du navire, de la sp\u00e9cification technique et du contrat de fourniture des appareils moteurs sur le mode d&rsquo;utilisation voulu par l&rsquo;armateur. Examen du<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3793"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3793\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3794,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3793\/revisions\/3794"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}