{"id":3825,"date":"1993-11-27T14:28:39","date_gmt":"1993-11-27T13:28:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3825"},"modified":"2016-06-29T14:31:01","modified_gmt":"2016-06-29T13:31:01","slug":"sentence-872","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1993\/11\/27\/sentence-872\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 872"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 872 &#8211; Synacomex, riz en sacs, exp\u00e9dition FAS, mouille par pluie, panneaux de cale non manoeuvrables, rupture charte-partie, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, droit d&rsquo;action, cessions de droits, r\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice, innavigabilit\u00e9, rejet demande en limitation au montant du fret, gr\u00e8ve \u00e9quipage, qualit\u00e9 agir, droit d&rsquo;action, panne des panneaux, non paiement des salaires, faute de gestion du fr\u00e9teur, dol, faute lourde, p\u00e9nalit\u00e9 retard. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex. Transport de riz en sacs pour l&rsquo;ALBANIE. Exp\u00e9dition FAS aux risques du chargeur. Mouille par pluie au port de charge ? Panneaux de cale non manoeuvrables. Rupture de la charte par le courtier affr\u00e9teur. Rejet du lot avari\u00e9. Remplacement de la quantit\u00e9 perdue et frais de transbordement. (1) Recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande. Droit d&rsquo;action r\u00e9sultant de deux cessions cons\u00e9cutives de droits (oui). (2) R\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice. Innavigabilit\u00e9 du navire au d\u00e9part. Carence fautive de l&rsquo;armateur. Rejet de la demande en limitation du montant du fret. limitation responsabilit\u00e9 (non).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 872 &#8211; Synacomex, riz en sacs, exp\u00e9dition FAS, mouille par pluie, panneaux de cale non manoeuvrables, rupture charte-partie, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, droit d&rsquo;action, cessions de droits, r\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice, innavigabilit\u00e9, rejet demande en limitation au montant du fret, gr\u00e8ve \u00e9quipage, qualit\u00e9 agir, droit d&rsquo;action, panne des panneaux, non paiement des salaires, faute de gestion du<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3825"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3825\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3826,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3825\/revisions\/3826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}