{"id":3828,"date":"1993-10-08T14:33:08","date_gmt":"1993-10-08T13:33:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3828"},"modified":"2016-06-29T14:33:43","modified_gmt":"2016-06-29T13:33:43","slug":"sentence-871","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1993\/10\/08\/sentence-871\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 871"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 871 &#8211; Synacomex 90, bl\u00e9 en vrac, r\u00e9duction du tonnage convenu, raisons de s\u00e9curit\u00e9, rupture affr\u00e8tement par l&rsquo;armateur, suppl\u00e9ment de fret, mis description, mis repr\u00e9sentation, stabilit\u00e9, faute grave, non pr\u00e9sentation du navire. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex 90. Transport d&rsquo;un tonnage de bl\u00e9 en vrac. Apr\u00e8s conclusion de l&rsquo;accord, demande de l&rsquo;armateur d&rsquo;une r\u00e9duction du tonnage convenu. Raisons de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 invoqu\u00e9es. Refus de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, demandant la pr\u00e9sentation d&rsquo;un autre navire apte \u00e0 charger. Rupture de l&rsquo;affr\u00e8tement de la part de l&rsquo;armateur. Demande de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur en paiement du suppl\u00e9ment de fret d\u00fb au titre d&rsquo;un autre navire retenu par ses soins. Demande bien fond\u00e9e.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 871 &#8211; Synacomex 90, bl\u00e9 en vrac, r\u00e9duction du tonnage convenu, raisons de s\u00e9curit\u00e9, rupture affr\u00e8tement par l&rsquo;armateur, suppl\u00e9ment de fret, mis description, mis repr\u00e9sentation, stabilit\u00e9, faute grave, non pr\u00e9sentation du navire. C\/P Synacomex 90. Transport d&rsquo;un tonnage de bl\u00e9 en vrac. Apr\u00e8s conclusion de l&rsquo;accord, demande de l&rsquo;armateur d&rsquo;une r\u00e9duction du tonnage convenu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3828"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3828\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3829,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3828\/revisions\/3829"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}