{"id":3873,"date":"1993-06-30T09:04:18","date_gmt":"1993-06-30T08:04:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3873"},"modified":"2016-07-29T09:17:06","modified_gmt":"2016-07-29T08:17:06","slug":"sentence-867","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1993\/06\/30\/sentence-867\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 867"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 867 &#8211; Synacomex, riz en sacs, fissure de la coque, \u00e9tat de navigabilit\u00e9, entrep\u00f4t flottant, mauvais \u00e9tat du navire, temp\u00eate de caract\u00e8re exceptionnel, occupation prolong\u00e9e du navire, utilisation abusive du navire, d\u00e9tention, compensation, art. 1289 C. Civ, 023. 2eme degr\u00e9. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex. Transport d&rsquo;une cargaison de riz en sacs de Sa\u00efgon \u00e0 divers ports africains, c\u00f4te ouest. Temp\u00eate. Fissure de la coque. Envahissement d&rsquo;une cale. Mouille partielle de la cargaison. Demandes r\u00e9ciproques des parties pour diverses sommes. (I) Mise en \u00e9tat de navigabilit\u00e9 au d\u00e9part. Diligence requise non fourni. (II) Longue immobilisation du navire. Utilisation comme \u00a0\u00bb entrep\u00f4t flottant \u00ab\u00a0. Responsabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur (oui). Solutions chiffr\u00e9es en r\u00e9sultant. Compensation l\u00e9gale (non).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 867 &#8211; Synacomex, riz en sacs, fissure de la coque, \u00e9tat de navigabilit\u00e9, entrep\u00f4t flottant, mauvais \u00e9tat du navire, temp\u00eate de caract\u00e8re exceptionnel, occupation prolong\u00e9e du navire, utilisation abusive du navire, d\u00e9tention, compensation, art. 1289 C. Civ, 023. 2eme degr\u00e9. C\/P Synacomex. Transport d&rsquo;une cargaison de riz en sacs de Sa\u00efgon \u00e0 divers ports<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3873"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3874,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3873\/revisions\/3874"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}