{"id":3891,"date":"1993-02-26T09:34:51","date_gmt":"1993-02-26T08:34:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3891"},"modified":"2016-07-29T09:35:46","modified_gmt":"2016-07-29T08:35:46","slug":"sentence-861","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1993\/02\/26\/sentence-861\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 861"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 861 &#8211; Gencon, clause 2, caf\u00e9, rongeurs, rejet de la marchandise pour raisons sanitaires, saisie conservatoire du navire, d\u00e9tention cons\u00e9cutive, responsabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, r\u00f4le de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, refus de la cargaison, vente sauvetage, n\u00e9gligence clause, minimiser pr\u00e9judice. 2eme degr\u00e9. <\/strong>C\/P Gencon, clause 2. Transport de caf\u00e9 vert en sacs au d\u00e9part de Singapour. Rongeurs morts et vivants constat\u00e9s dans les cales \u00e0 destination. Organisme \u00e9tatique destinataire. Rejet de la marchandises pour des raisons sanitaires. Saisie conservatoire du navire. D\u00e9tention cons\u00e9cutive durant sept mois. (1) Demande de surestaries; (2) Demande de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats pour perte \u00e0 la revente de la marchandise abandonn\u00e9e \u00e0 l&rsquo;armateur contre paiement par lui de la valeur r\u00e9clam\u00e9e. Responsabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur (oui). Rats.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 861 &#8211; Gencon, clause 2, caf\u00e9, rongeurs, rejet de la marchandise pour raisons sanitaires, saisie conservatoire du navire, d\u00e9tention cons\u00e9cutive, responsabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, r\u00f4le de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, refus de la cargaison, vente sauvetage, n\u00e9gligence clause, minimiser pr\u00e9judice. 2eme degr\u00e9. C\/P Gencon, clause 2. Transport de caf\u00e9 vert en sacs au d\u00e9part de Singapour. Rongeurs morts<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3891","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3891","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3891"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3891\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3892,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3891\/revisions\/3892"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3891"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}