{"id":3936,"date":"1992-06-24T10:30:48","date_gmt":"1992-06-24T09:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3936"},"modified":"2016-07-29T10:32:05","modified_gmt":"2016-07-29T09:32:05","slug":"sentence-846","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1992\/06\/24\/sentence-846\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 846"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 846 &#8211; Asbatankvoy, transport eau douce, refus chargement, d\u00e9tention damages, dommages aux installations \u00e0 terre, loi des parties, rupture unilat\u00e9rale de la charte, refus abusif. <\/strong>C\/P au voyage \u00ab\u00a0ASBATANKVOY\u00a0\u00bb. Transport d&rsquo;eau douce industrielle en citernes. Contrat \u00e0 ex\u00e9cution successive. Clauses ann\u00e9es sp\u00e9cifiques de la C\/P. Refus de chargement oppos\u00e9 par l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, pour plaques de rouille sur parois des cuves et fonds boueux. Rupture de l&rsquo;affr\u00e8tement. Application des clauses : la rupture ne fait pas grief \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de l&rsquo;une ou\u00a0l&rsquo;autre des parties. Cons\u00e9quences pour le calcul des \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9tentions damages\u00a0\u00bb, et les dommages aux installations de d\u00e9chargement et de stockage \u00e0 terre de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 846 &#8211; Asbatankvoy, transport eau douce, refus chargement, d\u00e9tention damages, dommages aux installations \u00e0 terre, loi des parties, rupture unilat\u00e9rale de la charte, refus abusif. C\/P au voyage \u00ab\u00a0ASBATANKVOY\u00a0\u00bb. Transport d&rsquo;eau douce industrielle en citernes. Contrat \u00e0 ex\u00e9cution successive. Clauses ann\u00e9es sp\u00e9cifiques de la C\/P. Refus de chargement oppos\u00e9 par l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, pour plaques de<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3936","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3936"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3936\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3937,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3936\/revisions\/3937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}