{"id":3945,"date":"1992-06-05T13:23:24","date_gmt":"1992-06-05T12:23:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3945"},"modified":"2016-08-02T13:24:31","modified_gmt":"2016-08-02T12:24:31","slug":"sentence-843","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1992\/06\/05\/sentence-843\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 843"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 843 &#8211; Synacomex, prescription de six mois, avaries, manquants, assureurs subrog\u00e9s dans les droits de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex. Courte prescription de six mois de la clause compromissoire. Jurisprudence de la CAMP en la mati\u00e8re. Action des assureurs de la cargaison contre le fr\u00e9teur au voyage. D\u00e9termination du titulaire du droit d&rsquo;action : l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, ou bien un tiers-porteur\u00a0? Solution retenue. Fin de non-recevoir opposable.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 843 &#8211; Synacomex, prescription de six mois, avaries, manquants, assureurs subrog\u00e9s dans les droits de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur. C\/P Synacomex. Courte prescription de six mois de la clause compromissoire. Jurisprudence de la CAMP en la mati\u00e8re. Action des assureurs de la cargaison contre le fr\u00e9teur au voyage. D\u00e9termination du titulaire du droit d&rsquo;action : l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, ou<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3945"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3945\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3946,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3945\/revisions\/3946"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}