{"id":3972,"date":"1992-03-23T15:07:28","date_gmt":"1992-03-23T14:07:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3972"},"modified":"2016-08-02T15:08:19","modified_gmt":"2016-08-02T14:08:19","slug":"sentence-834","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1992\/03\/23\/sentence-834\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 834"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 834 &#8211; Synacomex, formalit\u00e9s l\u00e9gales \u00e0 l&rsquo;importation, saisie navire \u00e0 destination, d\u00e9tention damage, taxe sur les marchandises, attestation de r\u00e9servation de cale (ci-apr\u00e8s ARC), Partage de responsabilit\u00e9. <\/strong> C\/P Synacomex. Transport de bl\u00e9 en vrac de Caen \u00e0 Matadi (Za\u00efre). Formalit\u00e9s l\u00e9gales \u00e0 l&rsquo;importation non respect\u00e9es. P\u00e9nalit\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9e. Saisie cons\u00e9cutive du navire \u00e0 destination. Imputation du pr\u00e9judice subi par l&rsquo;armateur (d\u00e9tention damage). Examen des responsabilit\u00e9s respectives. \u00c9l\u00e9ments d&rsquo;appr\u00e9ciation. Partage op\u00e9r\u00e9 : 2\/3 pour l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, 1\/3 pour l&rsquo;armateur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 834 &#8211; Synacomex, formalit\u00e9s l\u00e9gales \u00e0 l&rsquo;importation, saisie navire \u00e0 destination, d\u00e9tention damage, taxe sur les marchandises, attestation de r\u00e9servation de cale (ci-apr\u00e8s ARC), Partage de responsabilit\u00e9. C\/P Synacomex. Transport de bl\u00e9 en vrac de Caen \u00e0 Matadi (Za\u00efre). Formalit\u00e9s l\u00e9gales \u00e0 l&rsquo;importation non respect\u00e9es. P\u00e9nalit\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9e. Saisie cons\u00e9cutive du navire \u00e0 destination. Imputation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3972","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3972","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3972"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3972\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3973,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3972\/revisions\/3973"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3972"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3972"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3972"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}