{"id":3978,"date":"1993-03-18T10:20:10","date_gmt":"1993-03-18T09:20:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3978"},"modified":"2016-08-03T10:21:32","modified_gmt":"2016-08-03T09:21:32","slug":"sentence-832","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1993\/03\/18\/sentence-832\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 832"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><del><\/del><strong>Sentence 832 &#8211; Gencon, manquants, nombres constat\u00e9s, nombre colis manquants, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, qualit\u00e9 agir, b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire droits affr\u00e9teur, diff\u00e9rence, r\u00e9serves au connaissement, marchandise congel\u00e9e,\u00a0<\/strong><strong>constatations contradictoires. 2eme degr\u00e9. <\/strong>C\/P Gencon. Transport de viande congel\u00e9e en cartons. Nombre de cartons pris en charge au connaissement. Panneaux des cales scell\u00e9s apr\u00e8s chargement. R\u00e9serves au connaissement sur le nombre des colis charg\u00e9s. Manquants en nombre constat\u00e9s au port destinataire. Constatations non contradictoires.<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0) Recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande (oui)<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0) M\u00e9rite de la demande. Nombre des colis manquants non \u00e9tabli de fa\u00e7on\u00a0opposable \u00e0 l&rsquo;armateur-transporteur. Rejet de la demande.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 832 &#8211; Gencon, manquants, nombres constat\u00e9s, nombre colis manquants, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, qualit\u00e9 agir, b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire droits affr\u00e9teur, diff\u00e9rence, r\u00e9serves au connaissement, marchandise congel\u00e9e,\u00a0constatations contradictoires. 2eme degr\u00e9. C\/P Gencon. Transport de viande congel\u00e9e en cartons. Nombre de cartons pris en charge au connaissement. Panneaux des cales scell\u00e9s apr\u00e8s chargement. R\u00e9serves au connaissement sur le nombre des<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3978"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3978\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3979,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3978\/revisions\/3979"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}