{"id":3984,"date":"1992-01-22T10:26:35","date_gmt":"1992-01-22T09:26:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=3984"},"modified":"2016-08-03T10:27:10","modified_gmt":"2016-08-03T09:27:10","slug":"sentence-830","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1992\/01\/22\/sentence-830\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 830"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 830 &#8211; Gencon, mouille partielle, innavigabilit\u00e9, responsabilit\u00e9 du fr\u00e9teur, pertes en poids &#8211; Panneaux de cale. <\/strong>C\/P Gencon. Transport d&rsquo;engrais en vrac. Mouille partielle constat\u00e9e \u00e0 destination. Panneaux de cales corrod\u00e9s et perc\u00e9s. Innavigabilit\u00e9 du navire (oui). Recevabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;action des assureurs subrog\u00e9s dans les droits de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur au voyage (oui). Refus injustifi\u00e9 du r\u00e9ceptionnaire irlandais de recevoir la totalit\u00e9 de la cargaison. Discussion sur la teneur en eau du produit \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9tat sain. Responsabilit\u00e9 du fr\u00e9teur au voyage pour le seul tonnage effectivement avari\u00e9 par mouille d&rsquo;eau de mer et \u00e0 l&rsquo;exclusion des pertes en poids post\u00e9rieurs au d\u00e9barquement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 830 &#8211; Gencon, mouille partielle, innavigabilit\u00e9, responsabilit\u00e9 du fr\u00e9teur, pertes en poids &#8211; Panneaux de cale. C\/P Gencon. Transport d&rsquo;engrais en vrac. Mouille partielle constat\u00e9e \u00e0 destination. Panneaux de cales corrod\u00e9s et perc\u00e9s. Innavigabilit\u00e9 du navire (oui). Recevabilit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;action des assureurs subrog\u00e9s dans les droits de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur au voyage (oui). Refus injustifi\u00e9 du<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3984"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3984\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3985,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3984\/revisions\/3985"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}