{"id":4032,"date":"1991-06-12T13:24:51","date_gmt":"1991-06-12T12:24:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4032"},"modified":"2016-08-03T13:25:25","modified_gmt":"2016-08-03T12:25:25","slug":"sentence-814","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1991\/06\/12\/sentence-814\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 814"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 814 &#8211; Synacomex, bl\u00e9 en vrac, temp\u00eate, dommages \u00e9quipement portuaire, staries, force majeure, despatch-money, vente poids d\u00e9livr\u00e9, manquant en poids, irrecevable, surestaries, tiers-porteur connaissements, vent, tornade, \u00e9v\u00e9nement exceptionnel, force majeure, immobilisation appareils portuaires, laiss\u00e9 son tour. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex. Transport de bl\u00e9 en vrac. Temp\u00eate au port de d\u00e9chargement. Dommages \u00e0 l&rsquo;int\u00e9rieur pour force majeure (oui). Despatchmoney. Rejet de la demande de surestaries. Action r\u00e9cursoire subsidiaire de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur contre l&rsquo;acheteur-r\u00e9ceptionnaire. Rejet cons\u00e9cutif. Vente poids d\u00e9livr\u00e9. Manquant en poids all\u00e9gu\u00e9 par le r\u00e9ceptionnaire. Demande irrecevable pour d\u00e9faut d&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir. Action r\u00e9cursoire subsidiaire du fr\u00e9teur contre l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur. Rejet cons\u00e9cutif.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 814 &#8211; Synacomex, bl\u00e9 en vrac, temp\u00eate, dommages \u00e9quipement portuaire, staries, force majeure, despatch-money, vente poids d\u00e9livr\u00e9, manquant en poids, irrecevable, surestaries, tiers-porteur connaissements, vent, tornade, \u00e9v\u00e9nement exceptionnel, force majeure, immobilisation appareils portuaires, laiss\u00e9 son tour. C\/P Synacomex. Transport de bl\u00e9 en vrac. Temp\u00eate au port de d\u00e9chargement. Dommages \u00e0 l&rsquo;int\u00e9rieur pour force majeure<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4032"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4032\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4033,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4032\/revisions\/4033"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}