{"id":4117,"date":"1990-07-25T13:37:12","date_gmt":"1990-07-25T12:37:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4117"},"modified":"2016-08-10T13:37:50","modified_gmt":"2016-08-10T12:37:50","slug":"sentence-786","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1990\/07\/25\/sentence-786\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 786"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 786 &#8211; Gencon, fret lumpsum, , r\u00e9tention marchandise, non-paiement fret, d\u00e9chargement interrompu, lenteur transmissions int\u00e9rieur syst\u00e8me bancaire, paiement fret, droit de r\u00e9tention, retard r\u00e8glement, d\u00e9lai transmission, saisie conservatoire cargaison, proc\u00e9dure abusive, loi fran\u00e7aise, p\u00e9remption d&rsquo;instance- Lien clause. <\/strong>R\u00e9sum\u00e9 C\/P au voyage Gencon. Conditions de paiement du fret lumpsum. \u00ab\u00a0Lien clause\u00a0\u00bb. Port destinataire turc. R\u00e9tention \u00e0 bord de la marchandise par l&rsquo;armateur, au motif du non-paiement du fret. D\u00e9chargement interrompu pendant 22 jours. Suspension des staries par l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur. D\u00e9biteur du fret non responsable de la lenteur des transmissions \u00e0 l&rsquo;int\u00e9rieur du syst\u00e8me bancaire de son cr\u00e9ancier. R\u00e9tention de la cargaison injustifi\u00e9e. Proc\u00e9dure\u00a0abusive.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 786 &#8211; Gencon, fret lumpsum, , r\u00e9tention marchandise, non-paiement fret, d\u00e9chargement interrompu, lenteur transmissions int\u00e9rieur syst\u00e8me bancaire, paiement fret, droit de r\u00e9tention, retard r\u00e8glement, d\u00e9lai transmission, saisie conservatoire cargaison, proc\u00e9dure abusive, loi fran\u00e7aise, p\u00e9remption d&rsquo;instance- Lien clause. R\u00e9sum\u00e9 C\/P au voyage Gencon. Conditions de paiement du fret lumpsum. \u00ab\u00a0Lien clause\u00a0\u00bb. Port destinataire turc. R\u00e9tention<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4117"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4117\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4118,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4117\/revisions\/4118"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}