{"id":4120,"date":"1990-09-12T13:39:40","date_gmt":"1990-09-12T12:39:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4120"},"modified":"2016-08-10T13:40:06","modified_gmt":"2016-08-10T12:40:06","slug":"sentence-785","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1990\/09\/12\/sentence-785\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 785"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 785 &#8211; Synacomex, riz en sacs, surestaries, d\u00e9tention navire, <\/strong>R\u00e9sum\u00e9 C\/P au voyage Synacomex. Transport de riz en sacs de Bin Qasin \u00e0 Dakar. Litige portant sur le montant restant d\u00fb par l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur au titre de surestaries, d\u00e9tention de navire et remboursement de frais d&rsquo;escale \u00e0 Dakar, o\u00f9 le navire s&rsquo;est trouv\u00e9 immobilis\u00e9 du 8 avril au 20 octobre 1988. Condamnation par d\u00e9faut de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, qui avait d\u00e9clar\u00e9 dans une lettre \u00e0 la Chambre ne pas contester l&rsquo;ensemble de sa dette, sous r\u00e9serve de quelques v\u00e9rifications.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 785 &#8211; Synacomex, riz en sacs, surestaries, d\u00e9tention navire, R\u00e9sum\u00e9 C\/P au voyage Synacomex. Transport de riz en sacs de Bin Qasin \u00e0 Dakar. Litige portant sur le montant restant d\u00fb par l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur au titre de surestaries, d\u00e9tention de navire et remboursement de frais d&rsquo;escale \u00e0 Dakar, o\u00f9 le navire s&rsquo;est trouv\u00e9 immobilis\u00e9 du<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4120"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4120\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4121,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4120\/revisions\/4121"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}