{"id":4126,"date":"1990-10-01T14:03:19","date_gmt":"1990-10-01T13:03:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4126"},"modified":"2016-08-10T14:04:09","modified_gmt":"2016-08-10T13:04:09","slug":"sentence-783","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1990\/10\/01\/sentence-783\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 783"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 783 &#8211; Nype, conteneur, manquants, changement plomb scellement, partage co\u00fbt manquants, 2eme degr\u00e9. <\/strong>R\u00e9sum\u00e9 C\/P \u00e0 temps NYPE. Transport en conteneur \u00e0 destination d&rsquo;un pays arabe avec transbordement \u00e0 Naples. Manquants constat\u00e9s \u00e0 destination 37 jours apr\u00e8s transbordement. Changement du plomb de scellement constat\u00e9 \u00e0 Naples par l&rsquo;agent de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, mais apr\u00e8s transbordement sur le second navire. Clause de la charte pr\u00e9voyant un partage du co\u00fbt des manquants entre fr\u00e9teur et affr\u00e9teur. Recours de celui-ci contre celui-l\u00e0 d\u00e9clar\u00e9 non fond\u00e9. Preuve non apport\u00e9e de l&rsquo;existence des manquants avant transbordement sur le second navire.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 783 &#8211; Nype, conteneur, manquants, changement plomb scellement, partage co\u00fbt manquants, 2eme degr\u00e9. R\u00e9sum\u00e9 C\/P \u00e0 temps NYPE. Transport en conteneur \u00e0 destination d&rsquo;un pays arabe avec transbordement \u00e0 Naples. Manquants constat\u00e9s \u00e0 destination 37 jours apr\u00e8s transbordement. Changement du plomb de scellement constat\u00e9 \u00e0 Naples par l&rsquo;agent de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur, mais apr\u00e8s transbordement sur<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4126","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4126","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4126"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4126\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4127,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4126\/revisions\/4127"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4126"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4126"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4126"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}