{"id":4129,"date":"1990-09-25T14:06:04","date_gmt":"1990-09-25T13:06:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4129"},"modified":"2016-08-10T14:06:49","modified_gmt":"2016-08-10T13:06:49","slug":"sentence-782","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1990\/09\/25\/sentence-782\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 782"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 782 &#8211; Charbon- mouille d&rsquo;eau de mer &#8211; prescription, incomp\u00e9tence CAMP, comp\u00e9tence juridictionelle, causes interruption, absence de lien de droit entre chargeur et armateur-propri\u00e9taire. <\/strong>Contrat de tonnage. Importation de charbon sur 3 ann\u00e9es successives. Clause compromissoire de la charte-type annex\u00e9e. Dommages par mouille d&rsquo;eau de mer \u00e0 la cargaison lors d&rsquo;un voyage. (1) Recours des assureurs de la cargaison contre le fr\u00e9teur-transporteur au tonnage. Prescription acquise. Causes d&rsquo;interruption (non). (2) Recours des assureurs de la cargaison contre l&rsquo;armateur-propri\u00e9taire. Absence de lien de droit entre le chargeur- r\u00e9ceptionnaire et ce dernier. Tiers-porteur du connaissement anonyme (non). Incomp\u00e9tence de la CAMP.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 782 &#8211; Charbon- mouille d&rsquo;eau de mer &#8211; prescription, incomp\u00e9tence CAMP, comp\u00e9tence juridictionelle, causes interruption, absence de lien de droit entre chargeur et armateur-propri\u00e9taire. Contrat de tonnage. Importation de charbon sur 3 ann\u00e9es successives. Clause compromissoire de la charte-type annex\u00e9e. Dommages par mouille d&rsquo;eau de mer \u00e0 la cargaison lors d&rsquo;un voyage. (1) Recours<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4129","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4129"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4129\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4130,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4129\/revisions\/4130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}