{"id":4141,"date":"1990-08-02T14:21:14","date_gmt":"1990-08-02T13:21:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4141"},"modified":"2016-08-10T14:22:08","modified_gmt":"2016-08-10T13:22:08","slug":"sentence-778","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1990\/08\/02\/sentence-778\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 778"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 778 &#8211; Baltime, poissons, reefer, avaries d\u00e9cong\u00e9lation, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, propri\u00e9taire r\u00e9el navire, armateur-disposant, avaries, cargaison p\u00e9rissable, aptitude du navire , descente froid, maintien des temp\u00e9ratures, service requis, manque diligence, entretien navire, temp\u00e9rature cargaison. <\/strong>C\/P \u00e0 temps Baltime. Cargaison de poissons congel\u00e9s. (1) Demande du fr\u00e9teur pour la r\u00e9paration de dommages au navire imputable selon lui \u00e0 l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur : Rejet comme infond\u00e9e. (2) Demande de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur pour les avaries par d\u00e9cong\u00e9lation subies par la cargaison : Rejet comme infond\u00e9e, Il Santo par application de la clause 13 de la charte-partie.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 778 &#8211; Baltime, poissons, reefer, avaries d\u00e9cong\u00e9lation, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, propri\u00e9taire r\u00e9el navire, armateur-disposant, avaries, cargaison p\u00e9rissable, aptitude du navire , descente froid, maintien des temp\u00e9ratures, service requis, manque diligence, entretien navire, temp\u00e9rature cargaison. C\/P \u00e0 temps Baltime. Cargaison de poissons congel\u00e9s. (1) Demande du fr\u00e9teur pour la r\u00e9paration de dommages au navire imputable selon<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4141"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4141\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4142,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4141\/revisions\/4142"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}