{"id":4156,"date":"1990-05-07T14:33:54","date_gmt":"1990-05-07T13:33:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4156"},"modified":"2016-08-10T14:34:30","modified_gmt":"2016-08-10T13:34:30","slug":"sentence-773","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1990\/05\/07\/sentence-773\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 773"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 773 &#8211; Gencon, FIOS terms, irrecevabilit\u00e9, fret forfaitaire, fret suppl\u00e9mentaire, recevable, redressement judiciaire, transport bout en bout, parties contractantes, clause compromissoire, volume, exc\u00e8s marchandise &#8211; Volont\u00e9 des parties &#8211; fret lumpsum. <\/strong>C\/P Gencon (FIOS terms) &#8211; Demandeurs en situation de redressement judiciaire. Exception d&rsquo;irrecevabilit\u00e9 soulev\u00e9e par les D\u00e9fendeurs. Parties au contrat. Fret forfaitaire. Chargement suppl\u00e9mentaire. Demande de fret suppl\u00e9mentaire.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 773 &#8211; Gencon, FIOS terms, irrecevabilit\u00e9, fret forfaitaire, fret suppl\u00e9mentaire, recevable, redressement judiciaire, transport bout en bout, parties contractantes, clause compromissoire, volume, exc\u00e8s marchandise &#8211; Volont\u00e9 des parties &#8211; fret lumpsum. C\/P Gencon (FIOS terms) &#8211; Demandeurs en situation de redressement judiciaire. Exception d&rsquo;irrecevabilit\u00e9 soulev\u00e9e par les D\u00e9fendeurs. Parties au contrat. Fret forfaitaire. Chargement<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4156"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4157,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4156\/revisions\/4157"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}