{"id":4162,"date":"1990-06-01T14:39:54","date_gmt":"1990-06-01T13:39:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4162"},"modified":"2016-08-10T14:41:51","modified_gmt":"2016-08-10T13:41:51","slug":"sentence-772","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1990\/06\/01\/sentence-772\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 772"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 772 &#8211; Synacomex, avaries, frais acheminement, riz en sacs, comp\u00e9tence CAMP. Loi applicable, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, assureurs subrog\u00e9s, abandon voyage, endossataire connaissement, subrogation, innavigabilit\u00e9. Convention Bruxelles, manque diligence armateur, faute nautique, usages du commerce, vice cach\u00e9.\u00a0<\/strong>C\/P Synacomex. Navire tomb\u00e9 en panne par suite d&rsquo;une avarie totale du moteur. Frais d&rsquo;acheminement de la cargaison de riz en sacs.\u00a0(1) Comp\u00e9tence de la Chambre. (2) Loi applicable. (3) Recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande des assureurs subrog\u00e9s. (4) M\u00e9rite de la demande. Application des clauses 2 et 19 de la charte-partie. Exon\u00e9ration de l&rsquo;armateur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 772 &#8211; Synacomex, avaries, frais acheminement, riz en sacs, comp\u00e9tence CAMP. Loi applicable, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, assureurs subrog\u00e9s, abandon voyage, endossataire connaissement, subrogation, innavigabilit\u00e9. Convention Bruxelles, manque diligence armateur, faute nautique, usages du commerce, vice cach\u00e9.\u00a0C\/P Synacomex. Navire tomb\u00e9 en panne par suite d&rsquo;une avarie totale du moteur. Frais d&rsquo;acheminement de la cargaison de riz<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4162"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4162\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4163,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4162\/revisions\/4163"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}