{"id":4187,"date":"1990-03-20T08:53:25","date_gmt":"1990-03-20T07:53:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4187"},"modified":"2016-08-11T08:54:04","modified_gmt":"2016-08-11T07:54:04","slug":"sentence-764","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1990\/03\/20\/sentence-764\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 764"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 764 &#8211; Gencon, baryte, non r\u00e8glement, solde du fret, manquants, poids port\u00e9 au connaissement, pesage. <\/strong>C\/P Gencon. Chargement d&rsquo;un lot de baryte en vrac. Fret FIOST stipul\u00e9 payable 80 % \u00e0 la signature des B\/L, le solde \u00e0 la r\u00e9ception des documents. Non r\u00e8glement du solde de fret au motif de manquants \u00e0 destination. Demande reconventionnelle de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur pour ces manquants.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 764 &#8211; Gencon, baryte, non r\u00e8glement, solde du fret, manquants, poids port\u00e9 au connaissement, pesage. C\/P Gencon. Chargement d&rsquo;un lot de baryte en vrac. Fret FIOST stipul\u00e9 payable 80 % \u00e0 la signature des B\/L, le solde \u00e0 la r\u00e9ception des documents. Non r\u00e8glement du solde de fret au motif de manquants \u00e0 destination.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4187"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4188,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4187\/revisions\/4188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}