{"id":4205,"date":"1990-01-03T09:40:47","date_gmt":"1990-01-03T08:40:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4205"},"modified":"2016-08-11T09:41:44","modified_gmt":"2016-08-11T08:41:44","slug":"sentence-759","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1990\/01\/03\/sentence-759\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 759"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 759 – Avaries, bananes, obligations fr\u00e9teur, navigabilit\u00e9 navire, Gencon, responsabilit\u00e9 fr\u00e9teur, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, subrogation, mandat agir, identit\u00e9 demandeurs, subrogation, polluants, navigabilit\u00e9, cales propres, sans odeur, \u00e9tat navire, compatibilit\u00e9 cargaisons ant\u00e9rieurement, nettoyage cales, n\u00e9gligence \u00e9quipage, faute personnelle fr\u00e9teur, clause 2. Gencon. <\/strong>Contrat de fret. Affr\u00e8tement au voyage. Avaries \u00e0 une cargaison de bananes caus\u00e9es par les produits d’un changement au voyage pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Fins de non-recevoir. Rejet.<\/li>\n
  2. M\u00e9rite de la demande. Obligations du fr\u00e9teur. Mise en \u00e9tat de navigabilit\u00e9 du navire. Inapplicabilit\u00e9 de la clause 2 de la C\/P Gencon. Responsabilit\u00e9 du fr\u00e9teur.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Sentence 759 – Avaries, bananes, obligations fr\u00e9teur, navigabilit\u00e9 navire, Gencon, responsabilit\u00e9 fr\u00e9teur, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, subrogation, mandat agir, identit\u00e9 demandeurs, subrogation, polluants, navigabilit\u00e9, cales propres, sans odeur, \u00e9tat navire, compatibilit\u00e9 cargaisons ant\u00e9rieurement, nettoyage cales, n\u00e9gligence \u00e9quipage, faute personnelle fr\u00e9teur, clause 2. Gencon. Contrat de fret. Affr\u00e8tement au voyage. Avaries \u00e0 une cargaison de bananes caus\u00e9es par<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4205"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4205\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4206,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4205\/revisions\/4206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}