{"id":4248,"date":"1989-07-03T13:04:52","date_gmt":"1989-07-03T12:04:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4248"},"modified":"2016-08-11T13:05:51","modified_gmt":"2016-08-11T12:05:51","slug":"sentence-748","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1989\/07\/03\/sentence-748\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 748"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 748 &#8211; Synacomex, semoule, accords francoalgerien, manquants, avaries, sousaffr\u00e9teur, transport effectif, \u00ab\u00a0contra non valent em agere \u00ab\u00a0, art. 2246 CC, exception de prescription rejet\u00e9e. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex (deux chartes adoss\u00e9es). Transport de semoule de Rouen sur l&rsquo;Alg\u00e9rie en onze exp\u00e9ditions successives. Accords franco-alg\u00e9riens de partage de trafic. Sous-affr\u00e8tement \u00e0 un transporteur n\u00e9erlandais par un armateur fran\u00e7ais dont les connaissements seront utilis\u00e9s par le premier. Avaries et manquants \u00e0 destination. Condamnations prononc\u00e9es par les tribunaux alg\u00e9riens. Garantie due en principe par le sous-affr\u00e9teur, transporteur effectif, \u00e0 son fr\u00e9teur transporteur apparent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 748 &#8211; Synacomex, semoule, accords francoalgerien, manquants, avaries, sousaffr\u00e9teur, transport effectif, \u00ab\u00a0contra non valent em agere \u00ab\u00a0, art. 2246 CC, exception de prescription rejet\u00e9e. C\/P Synacomex (deux chartes adoss\u00e9es). Transport de semoule de Rouen sur l&rsquo;Alg\u00e9rie en onze exp\u00e9ditions successives. Accords franco-alg\u00e9riens de partage de trafic. Sous-affr\u00e8tement \u00e0 un transporteur n\u00e9erlandais par un armateur<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4248"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4248\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4249,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4248\/revisions\/4249"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}