{"id":4281,"date":"1989-06-15T13:56:44","date_gmt":"1989-06-15T12:56:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4281"},"modified":"2016-08-11T13:59:03","modified_gmt":"2016-08-11T12:59:03","slug":"sentence-737","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1989\/06\/15\/sentence-737\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 737"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 737 – Bananes, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, principe de bonne foi (Art. 1134 C.Civ.) contamination, \u00e9thyl\u00e8ne, art. 11 NCPC – avaries – panneaux de cale. 2eme degr\u00e9. <\/strong>Contrat de fret. Affr\u00e8tement au voyage. Avaries \u00e0 une cargaison de bananes.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. I) Recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande. Application du principe de bonne foi au d\u00e9roulement de la proc\u00e9dure.<\/li>\n
  2. II) M\u00e9rite de la demande. Refus du capitaine de laisser v\u00e9rifier l’\u00e9tat des panneaux de cale par fumig\u00e8nes.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Application de l’article 11 NCPC. Condamnation partielle du fr\u00e9teur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Sentence 737 – Bananes, recevabilit\u00e9 demande, principe de bonne foi (Art. 1134 C.Civ.) contamination, \u00e9thyl\u00e8ne, art. 11 NCPC – avaries – panneaux de cale. 2eme degr\u00e9. Contrat de fret. Affr\u00e8tement au voyage. Avaries \u00e0 une cargaison de bananes. I) Recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande. Application du principe de bonne foi au d\u00e9roulement de la proc\u00e9dure. II)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4281"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4281\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4282,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4281\/revisions\/4282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}